Several years ago, in my Borderland of Adventure campaign, our band of heroes explored a fragment of the upper level of The Forge of Fury. Sadly, their exploration was cut short when their foray alerted a tribe of orcs in the upper level. In the ensuing battle, the party were forced to flee—and only escaped because of the heroic sacrifice of one of their number.
Not running the rest of the module is one of my biggest—recent—gaming regrets. However, at the time the campaign was much more a sandbox affair and the party chose to go elsewhere, instead of returning to the Forge’s blood-soaked halls. Such is life.
Anyway, my thoughts have again returned to The Forge of Fury as part of my quest to analyse good—and bad—dungeon design.
I’ve always been impressed with the adventure; for my money it’s one of WoTC’s best 3rd Edition era modules. This feat is made even more impressive because it’s one of the first 3rd edition modules and thus the designer—Richard Baker—was still grappling with new rules. Sure, the module doesn’t really have a particularly clever or convoluted plot—in essence it’s a fairly standard dungeon crawl—but complexity isn’t always the be and end all. Often, simplicity is superior to complexity.
As a basic, flavoursome dungeon crawl I think The Forge of Fury is particularly well executed. Why? Read on!
Khundrukar—the dungeon setting—comprises five different levels. Even better, each level has its own feel:
- The Mountain Door: The entry level primarily comprises dwarven defences.
- The Glitterhame: A large series of natural caverns.
- The Sinkhole: Dark, dank caverns, forgotten dwarven storerooms and a subterranean river.
- The Foundry: Dwarven halls and chambers comprising a forge and other areas.
- The Black Lake: A large, winding cavern filled with water seeping down from the nearby Dark Mere.
And—as an aside—the levels are laid out so that the party can explore as the mood takes them. While they have to go through certain areas to progress to the Black Lake (the final level) they can explore the upper levels pretty much as they want. I love this feature of the dungeon’s design. Current modules are much more linear—and poorer for it.
For the most part, each of the five levels showcases different challenges and opponents for the PCs to overcome:
- The Mountain Door: An orc tribe led by Great Ulfe (their ogre chieftain) has claimed the Mountain Door.
- The Glitterhame: Troglodytes dwell in the Glitterhame. A few other scavengers and suchlike share the caverns.
- The Sinkhole: Mainly abandoned, this area is (probably) the most dangerous place in the dungeon for here lurks a roper! Unwary parties are likely doomed. (But, it is important to note, adventurers do not have to slay the roper to proceed.)
- The Foundry: Undead and perfectly working dwarven traps lurk in the foundry along with a handful of duergar who have begun to explore the forges.
- The Black Lake: The main—indeed only—foe here except the frigid waters of the Black Lake is a young black dragon. The combat is made harder by the fact she is very much at home in the lake’s waters while the party could find themselves at a serious disadvantage.
The Forge of Fury also does some other things right:
- Empty Space: Unlike modern adventures, not every chamber or cavern in Khundrukar hosts a denizen or trap. Some places are empty or abandoned; nevertheless many are well described so the players can poke about and the GM can build the dungeon’s (and level’s) flavour into his game. That’s a refreshing change to dungeons these days. (As an aside, I’m running a dungeon at the moment and virtually every room in the relatively linear dungeon has a monster or trap in it—which I’m finding less than exciting to run).
- Hard (and Easy) Encounters: Some of the foes lurking in Khundrukar are easy to overcome; others—notably the roper and a succubus—are spectacularly hard to defeat and could wipe out the party. Very hard and very easy encounters are a feature of Old School play which has fallen out of favour in recent editions, but which I wish was more prevalent in Pathfinder. I’ve blogged before about our obsession with balance and I think the CR system—while well intentioned—is to blame for a lot of the angst around “unbalanced encounters”.
- Multiple Entrances:There are several ways to get into the dungeon, although two are hardly obvious. That’s good, though, because skilled players may find one or more of the hidden entrances, which—after all—rewards superior play.
What’s Not to Like?
As a dungeon crawl, I think Forge of Fury does a lot of things right. However, it’s not perfect.
- Role-Playing: Most of the encounters in The Forge of Fury can be solved with good old fashioned violence. While there’s lots of scope for exploration, clever tactics and sandbox exploration, not many of the encounters are resolvable through role-playing. That’s a shame as it doesn’t leave a tremendous amount of things for bards and the like to do. Similarly, players who prefer role-playing will find few opportunities to practise the fine arts of diplomacy, flattery and betrayal.
- Remote Location: The Forge of Fury can be set virtually anywhere in a GM’s campaign, but it “works particularly well if you pick a remote range of hugged hills or highland several days from the nearest town.” While that’s not necessarily a problem, it does mean the PCs are a decent distance from a safe base in which they can restock, rearm and rest. This might slow exploration of the dungeon down as the PCs trek backwards and forwards. This isn’t a deal breaker by any means for me, but it’s something to consider when planning to run the adventure.
- No Wandering Monsters: The adventure has no wandering monster tables. I love wandering monsters—even though they have fallen out of favour in recent editions.
- No Rumours: I would have liked to see a “Whispers & Rumours” style table in the Introduction or Character Hooks sections. Most players are going to try and find out more about the place before they visit it—if only to be better prepared—and it would have been nice to have a handy table of such facts available for the GM. I love rumours, and I have fond memories of that great table in B2 The Keep on the Borderlands—and the players trying to work out which rumours were true and which were false!
At the end of the day, though, these are all pretty minor gripes, which any competent GM could easily fix. The Forge of Fury is a great low-level adventure I’d highly recommend to anyone who hasn’t played it yet and who likes dungeon crawls.
What Did I Miss?
Did I miss anything you particularly like or dislike about The Forge of Fury? Let me know, in the comments below.
Want More Dungeon Design Tips?
Check out all my musings on dungeon design here by scrolling down to the handily titled “Dungeon Design” section or check out my own nascent megadungeon–Gloamhold!
23 thoughts on “Just How Good is The Forge of Fury?”
See I own Forge of Fury, but have never run it. Having just started a new Pathfinder low level sandbox game, I might have to drop it into the map as an adventure site. I’m currently using the Duchy of Ashlar map as I think it’s a great sandbox to get some lapsed players back into playing.
I’m growing to love Old School design more and more as I do like my players to have a world that seems as real as possible, and not just that the world levels as they do.
Keep up the great articles Creighton, you are acting as my Old School guide!
Thanks for the jolly kind comments, Gareth. You made my morning!
If you are using Ashlar for your campaign setting, I’d recommend sticking the Forge of Fury where Vongyth currently stands.
Along with ‘Tomb of Abysthor,’ my favorite 3rd Edition module. It’s hard. Really hard. And I’ve softened up the entry portion before, but I think that Forge is a great deal of fun. It’s also a nice module to use if you want to run a “dwarves reclaiming a lost hall” adventure.
Somehow I missed the Duchy of Ashlar.
Now I have another beginning sandbox area! WooHoo!
I originally purchased Forge of Fury after reading Creighton’s players’ woes in that dungeon. I figured any adventure that had orcs with a sneaky way to hit the party from the other side was an adventure I needed to hunt down!
I’ve been on an old-school kick recently, rereading Caverns of Thracia and looking at hex-crawls. No good can come of this!
I ran Forge of Fury after starting in Raging Swans’ Swallowfeld.
Shadowed Keep on the Borderlands (RS)
Keep on the Borderlands
Forge of Fury
Against the Cult of the Bat God (RS)
Notice a trend there? I love your modules, Creighton, and I hope you write a couple more next year! You really capture that old school feeling that my party loves so much.
I ran Forge of Fury for the first time ever this year and my party and I had a blast. It had enough of a sandbox element to it that they didn’t feel railroaded but it was challenging enough that they had to pick and choose when and where to fight. On a concept level it is a lot like Shadowed Keep.
Keep up the good work 🙂
Blimey. Very cool. Thank you for the kind words. Hopefully, you’ll enjoy Gloamhold when I release the Campaign Guide–which is my main focus over the next month or so.
I’m also putting together a Collector’s Edition of Fane of the Undying Sleeper, which will be out early in 2016 with new maps, illustrations and an updated text. I think you’ll like it if you liked Agains the Cult of the Bat God.
Many years ago, like yourself, I began running Forge of Fury, but we didn’t get very far into it (though the fault was mine; I got sidetracked with non-gaming-related things). But I always thought it looked promising. I came up with a fair amount of lore connected to what details there were in the module, and so “seeded” my game with some of it. The piece I was most proud of was an iambic tetrameter poem I wrote, presented as a Dwarven lament, which described the forge’s creator and his motivations for crafting it; I even found a piece of music from a movie soundtrack that I felt fit the tone of the lament. I’ll have to dig out my copy of the module and see if my old notes are still with it…
That sounds very cool. I’d love to see the lament. I’m terrible with poetry and that kind of thing. Can I steal it for my campaign–to lure my player back there sometime?
That sounds absolutely tremendous! That’s what game mastering and making pre-written adventures your very own.
I do like this module, and for many of the reasons you listed! I like the maps too- not overly complex, but nicely done!
Forge of Fury is one of my top 3 adventures, of all time, for the same reasons you listed. As for the “cons” listed, an experienced DM can easily make adjustments to suit thier needs.
As a DM, I have taken on the challenge of roleplaying my monsters wherever possible. Any creature that has a language, whether it is understood or not, has the potential to attempt to negotiate with the characters. You just have to give it a motivation that is stinger than eating the heroes.
It is a fine adventure, and I have adapted it for my campaign, leaving clues to further adventures within the Forge. The minor short comings that you note can be remedied without too much work by any game master worth his/her salt. I enjoyed the adventure very much, though I agree with you – there aren’t many opportunities for role-playing as the module is written.
Thanks for the write-up, Mr. Broadhurst! I think I still have this module in my collection, and a player who LOVES dungeon crawls. I’m going to see if I can dig it up. Of course, if I want to add more flavor, I have Dungeon Dressing. ;^)
My pleasure! And, yes I think Dungeon Dressing would work very well with this module. I feel I should also heroically (and selflessly) point out 20 Things #23: Fallen Dwarven Hold…
Perhaps it’s just my group. I don’t know why, but Forge of Fury, on paper, looked amazing.
When we played back then, though, it turned into a pretty boring slog. The dungeon’s architecture and change of scenery is great and all, but the constant emphasis on ” (Attempt to) KILL EVERYTHING”, the lack of interesting, skill-based options and roleplaying opportunities made it a chore to finish. Sure, a good GM can add them…but better modules have that hard-baked into them.
Compared to many other dungeons of this size, I was missing the details, the small weirdnesses. In a strange way, it turned into an old-school looking dungeon that ticks off all boxes, but still doesn’t come together as it should. To me, it was painfully run-of-the-mill and never really managed to captivate any of my players. It actually became a reason I playtest as many adventures as possible. More often than not, playtesting can show weaknesses.
Personally, I consider all your adventures to be vastly superior, and same goes for FGG, Kobold Press and a ton of OSR-adventures out there.
Just my 2 cents, of course – happy to hear that many folks had a better time with this one than I did! 🙂
That’s jolly decent of you, old chum. I won’t turn down your kind words!
(I’m sorry you chaps didn’t enjoy Forge of Fury, though; certainly if your players weren’t keen to kill everything then it could have come across as quite a one-dimensional dungeon.)
My group enjoyed Forge of Fury when we played through it, and I have fond memories of running it. However, it was one of the first 3rd edition adventures we played, so we were happy just to be back playing D&D again.
There is a really cool adventure called Mines, Claws and Princesses (pay what you want on Drivethru) that was inspired by Forge of Fury and is well worth a look. I have no connection to the author!
Thanks for the recommendation, Jeff. I’ll check it out! It sounds intriguing.
I am just running the 5e version taken from from Tales of the Yawning Portal. I felt it was time for a good old dungeon crawl as my group seemed to be a bit bored of sandbox intrigue and diplomacy. It is a hit! I think my players like it because the dungeon has a nice mix of everything and the whole adventure is quite polished. It also allows the players to make a lot of interesting decisions and thr exploration parts are really diversified. My group somehow managed to enter through the orc tunnel facing the Troglodytes, which is maybe a better/softer start into the dungeon and gives the challenges a nice progression. Last time we played they had to face the roper and were completely surprised. One of the most exciting (and close) battles ever
I’m running the Tales From the Yawning Portal series of adventures for 5e, and my group have just completed The Sunless Citadel. I’m going to run the Forge of Fury next, and have been reading through it – have to say, it looks pretty exciting! I just have to contrive a reason for them to go there, but that should be easy enough! As for RP opportunities…. one of the PCs is a Warlock with an infernal patron. I suspect delving into the deep dark places of the world might provide some interesting opportunities for some moral challenges for him if Errtu decides to “take notice” of his activities…
I just finished this one up this fall- loved every minute of it I dropped it into an existing campaign, so I ended up changing it quite a bit, but the framework was as solid as they come! The players had a blast all the way to the black dragon encounter… they all had great fun, even though two characters didn’t make it back out!
I’m running this now for a group of very new players (very new to D&D altogether). They just got done defeating Old Yarrack and Great Ulfe, and very nearly died from the fight. I had Yarrack and the four orcs come out to investigate the noise these guys made while fighting Ulfe, because they killed him far too easily, and Yarrack’s group proceeded to destroy them. Some fudging and hinting on my part (I’m being kind to them since they don’t quite know all the rules and all their abilities yet,) let them off the hook. The bard was knocked out and then rolled a nat 1 on his death save, and then the paladin took 33 on a crit from Yarrack – 1 hp left – and then used Lay on Hands on him and Sanctuary on the bard, saving them both.
They whittled Yarrack down, before the bard Viciously Mocked him to death – just as he’d done to Ulfe earlier.
All that’s to say, if the dice will it, and your timing’s good, even the lack of rp elements won’t faze a bard.